By Prachi Salve & Sanja Pandit
India’s fastest–growing state is Meghalaya at 9.7 percent in 2013–14, higher than the fastest–growing big state, Madhya Pradesh, at 9.5 percent. Aruchal Pradesh grew faster than Gujarat.
Fewer people, 12.8 million, live below the poverty line in the entire northeast than in just one large state, Kartaka, which has 12.9 million poor people.
Tripura reported India’s highest unemployment rate, 25.2 percent in urban areas, followed closely by galand with 23.8 percent in 2011–12. The highest unemployment in the urban areas of a large state was 7 percent, in Jammu and Kashmir.
The eight north–eastern states – Aruchal Pradesh, Assam, Manipur, Meghalaya, Mizoram, galand, Sikkim (added in 2002) and Tripura – are growing fast, educating their people at a rate much faster than the rest of India, reducing their dependence on agriculture, and generally prospering, IndiaSpend research has revealed, but the growth is not creating enough jobs and livelihood opportunities.
Other thing evident is that while northeast states are often clubbed together, we found, in many cases, wide differences; for example, Manipur’s high poverty rate and Sikkim’s prosperity. Some of the economic indices are India’s highest, and some are India’s lowest. Today, in the first of a three–part series, we alyse the northeast’s economic indicators, such as gross state domestic product (GSDP), unemployment, and population below the poverty line.
Growth driven by services, industry
Meghalaya, Tripura and Aruchal Pradesh recorded the highest growth rates in GSDP in 2013–14.
Meghalaya’s growth in GSDP of 9.7 percent was equivalent to Bihar, which had a GSDP growth rate of 9.1 percent.
Aruchal Pradesh, with a growth rate in GSDP of 8.9 percent grew faster than Gujarat, which reported 8.7 percent.
The share of the industrial sector for all eight states has increased while the share of agriculture and allied activities has declined. Unemployment in urban areas across all north–eastern states is higher than rural areas, and is in line with the tiol pattern.
"The growth in manufacturing has not been accompanied by a commensurate growth of employment opportunity for the local population," Sumarbin Umdor, professor of economics at North–Eastern Hill University, wrote in a column. "Given the lack of job creation in other formal sectors, most of the employment outside agriculture is therefore in the low productivity informal sector, particularly in informal construction, retail trade and transportation."
Tripura recorded the highest unemployment rate in urban areas at 25.2 percent in 2011–12, India’s highest jobless rate, followed by galand with 23.8 percent, India’s second–highest rate, and Manipur with 7.1 percent.
Meghalaya had India’s second–lowest unemployment rate (after Gujarat), with 0.4 percent in rural areas and 2.8 percent in urban areas in 2011–12.
A caveat: Unemployment rates in rural India are always lower than urban, since they do not account for hidden or partial employment. In general, employment rates do not adequately reflect reality, but only offer an indication.
Poverty unevenly spread: Manipur is poorest; Sikkim richest
The Northeast has widely varying rates of poverty, which largely reflect unrest and insurgency.
While 36.9 percent people live below the poverty line (the ability to spend Rs 1,170 per family per month in urban areas, Rs.1,118 in rural areas) in Manipur, where a cocktail of insurgent groups have crippled the economy, only 8.2 percent of the population is below the poverty line in Sikkim (Rs.1,226 in urban, Rs.930 in rural), where plentiful hydro power has raised incomes, as IndiaSpend has reported.
Meghalaya and Sikkim have seen some of the largest falls in poverty in India.
For instance, the percentage of population below the poverty line in Sikkim was 13.1 percent in 2009–10 and fell to 8.2 percent in 2011–12. In comparison, poverty in Bihar and Madhya Pradesh – the large states most successful in cutting poverty – fell from 36.7 percent to 31.7 percent and 37.7 percent to 29.4 percent over the same period.
Similarly, in Meghalaya, the percentage of population below the poverty line was 17.1 percent in 2009–10 and fell to 11.9 percent in 2011–12.
Although the number of people below the poverty line might be lower than the tiol average, the intensity of poverty in these states is much higher, according to the tiol Institute of Rural Development (NIRD).
Poverty in the Northeast, like the rest of India, is a more rural phenomenon than urban: 11.6 million people of the 12.8 million living below the poverty line are in rural areas.
The two main reasons for poverty are under–developed agriculture and unskilled labour, according to NIRD.
To address the region’s development challenges, including infrastructure, the Central government created the ministry of development of northeastern region in 2004, allocating it Rs.2,362 crore in 2015–16. The grants from the centre and their share in central taxes together form 79 percent of their total revenue, according to the Reserve Bank of India.
Some of the grants, like the ones given out by the ministry are influenced by politics as well. For example, from 2010–11 to 2012–13, Aruchal Pradesh received the highest, with almost 19 percent of the total allocations. Later, when the government wanted to sign the ga peace accord of 2015, the allocation to galand was increased (to 20 percent) and that of Aruchal Pradesh had come down.
(In arrangement with IndiaSpend.org, a data–driven, non–profit, public interest jourlism platform, where Prachi Salve is a policy alyst and Samja Pandit is an intern and a student at St. Xavier’s, Mumbai. The views expressed are those of India Spend. The authors can be contacted at email@example.com)