By Devanik Saha
Catastrophic materl healthcare expenses push 46.6 per cent mothers in India into poverty — with the illiterate being especially susceptible — according to a December 2016 study by researchers from Jawaharlal Nehru University (JNU) and Indian Institute of Technology, Roorkee (IIT-R). The expenses include childbirth, antetal care and posttal care expenses.
Catastrophic expenditure is greater than or equal to 40 per cent of a household’s non-subsistence income, i.e. income available after basic needs have been met, according to the World Health Organisation (WHO). The threshold of 40 per cent can differ according to countries, said the WHO; the 2016 study has alysed the data at two thresholds: 10 and 40 per cent.
As many as 63 per cent households tionwide had a catastrophic materl health expenditure of 40 per cent, the study — which alysed data from the tiol Sample Survey Office — found. Among states and Union territories (UTs), 65.7 per cent households (among those where a woman had delivered) in Telanga were pushed into poverty — more than any other state/UT — due to childbearing expenses, followed by Chhattisgarh (53.7 per cent) and Puducherry (53.4 per cent). In the 10 years to 2014, out-of-pocket (OOP) health spending has pushed 50.6 million people back into poverty.
Households where the mothers were illiterate were the most affected, with 61 per cent of them being pushed into poverty —despite having the lowest materl health OOP expenditure at Rs 3,600 — compared to 36.7 per cent of households where women were graduates and above, who had an OOP expenditure of Rs 19,250.
More illiterate women prefer public hospitals for delivery in both rural (79.2 per cent) and urban areas (67.7 per cent), which possibly explains their low OOP.
Among women of different social groups, women belonging to scheduled tribes (STs) had the least materl OOP expenditure at Rs 2,962, but 71.5 per cent of them were pushed into poverty. As many as 85 per cent ST women in rural areas delivered in public hospitals — more than any other social group.
The study holds relevance in the context of the central government announcement on May 18, 2017, that it is revising the Indira Gandhi Matritva Sahyog Yoja (Maternity Benefit Programme), announced by Prime Minister rendra Modi on December 31, 2016, by restricting the scheme to firstborns instead of “first two live births” as applicable earlier.
The programme aims to give Rs 6,000 to pregnt women for childbearing expenses. The scheme saw an increase of 226 per cent in allocation in the 2017-18 budget from Rs 634 crore to Rs 2,700 crore. However, the government had estimated that the annual requirement for the maternity benefit scheme would be Rs 14,512 crore, according to a report in The Indian Express.
The 2016 study revealed that, on average, a woman incurred an OOP expenditure of Rs 8,543 on childbearing. There were huge variations among states — from Rs 2,801 in Uttarakhand to Rs 15,433 in Telanga.
“In most parts of the country, there is a two-child norm and a scheme like this will not benefit most women. The government should concentrate on quality care for pregnt women and make available the benefits to every woman who reaches a government health care centre,” Tania Sheshadri, an independent community health researcher who works with rural women in Kartaka, was recently quoted as saying in news reports.
A limitation of the 2016 study is that it does not consider the benefits of Jani Suraksha Yoja (JSY, motherhood protection scheme), a 12-year-old government programme focused specially on 10 states with low rates of institutiol delivery — Uttar Pradesh, Uttarakhand, Bihar, Jharkhand, Madhya Pradesh, Chhattisgarh, Assam, Rajasthan, Odisha, and Jammu and Kashmir — termed as low-performing states (LPS).
Under the programme, pregnt women in rural areas who live below the poverty line are to be given cash assistance — Rs 700 in high performing states and Rs 1,400 in LPS — irrespective of the mother’s age and number of children so that they opt for birth in a government or accredited private health facility.
The scheme has failed to cover the poorest women, according to a 2014 alysis of JSY data by researchers from Georgetown University. As many as 60 per cent women in Uttar Pradesh said they had to pay for certain public materl health services, according to an assessment of JSY conducted by United tions Population Fund in Bihar, Madhya Pradesh, Odisha, Rajasthan and Uttar Pradesh in 2012. (IANS)