Uncertainty is looming large over the appointment of additiol judges
in various High Courts whose two–year terms are to end soon. Questions
are also being raised as to when 251 vacant posts of judges in High
Courts and three vacancies in the Supreme Court will be filled. This
uncertainty stems from the refusal of Chief Justice of India H L Dattu’s
to join the tiol Judicial Appointments Commission, because the
NJAC’s constitutiol validity is itself being challenged in the apex
court. After Parliament passed the NJAC Act to replace the collegium
system of appointing judges, the Supreme Court refused to stay the new
law. So the rendra Modi government notified the law and is now moving
to make it operatiol. As part of this move, the Chief Justice of India
will have to head the six–member NJAC, with its other five members to
be two seniormost Supreme Court judges, the Union Law minister and two
eminent persons. The new law mandates that these two eminent persons
will be selected by a panel comprising the Prime Minister, the Leader of
Opposition or Leader of the largest opposition party in the Lok Sabha,
and the Chief Justice of India. The CJI’s refusal to join this panel has
brought into focus the face–off between the Judiciary and the
Executive. It is now feared that if this stalemate continues, it will
further lead to increased pendency. At the end of February last, a total
of 61,300 cases were pending in the Supreme Court, while around 45 lakh
cases are pending in 24 High Courts. The earlier collegium system was
abolished due to perceived shortcomings in the appointment of judges,
but the Supreme Court may find parts of the new NJAC law impinging on
the independence of the Judiciary, and could strike these parts down.
The problem is that in India, the roles played by the Legislature and
the Executive have left much to be desired. So the Judiciary had to move
out of its role of being the custodian of the Constitution and
interpreting the law. In chasing black money abroad, making coal block
allotment transparent, cleaning up the air of Delhi or even ensuring
proper and timely update of NRC in Assam, the Supreme Court has had to
play an activist role. For the good of the country therefore, this
face–off needs to be resolved amicably and soon.