By Rishika Pardikar
Private education could cost 2-3 per cent more if taxed at the lowest slab of 5 per cent under the Goods and Services Tax (GST), according to our alysis of the bill’s provisions.
The GST bill passed by the Lok Sabha (lower house of Parliament) on March 29, carries a provision that says certain services provided by the government or local authority would not be liable to tax.
Fincial experts believe that the provision was inserted to exempt education and health services, in addition to a list of other services, when provided by the government or the local authority.
The provision could be extrapolated to mean that private education in India would be liable to tax once GST becomes law.
Tax exemptions have been granted to both public and private institutions engaged in providing education. Extending exemption benefits to private schools, considering their commercial success, has not always been an idea that found mass support.
“Charitable purpose”, as defined by law, includes relief to poor, education, medical relief, and the advancement of any other object of general public utility. The words “not involving the carrying on of any activity of profit” were omitted by the Fince Act, 1983.
Continuing in the same vein, a circular was issued by the Central Board of Direct Taxes in 2008, clarifying that an institution providing relief to the poor, education and medical facilities, would be allowed exemption even when it has incidental commercial activities.
The GST regime is now set to disrupt the status-quo, including educatiol activities.
GST is an indirect tax — a tax on consumption of goods and services. An inherent feature of indirect tax is that the burden of the tax, rather than being borne by the industry (i.e., the manufacturers or traders or service providers), is passed to the consumers.
So, GST on private education, if it is implemented, would be borne by those looking to avail education services. Therefore, the issue of whether education is the place for disruptions, which might otherwise be a good thing, merits consideration.
Education, once viewed largely as a philanthropic activity, has now metamorphosed into a $100 billion (Rs 6.5 lakh crore) industry, with the private sector balancing investor returns and social responsibility, while the public sector is struggling with idequate faculty and outdated curriculum.
Greece, for instance, imposed a 23 per cent value added tax (VAT) on private educatiol establishments in 2015.
“It looked like a double win that would simultaneously please creditors and demonstrate the government’s commitment to helping the underprivileged. Unsurprisingly, it did neither,” The Economist reported on October 30, 2015.
Within months, reasobly priced private schools were forced to shut down. Those who suffered as a consequence were not just the rich but also middle- and lower-income groups.
Private schools located in working class areas charged affordable tuition fees and attracted working class parents who were keen their children receive a good education. The VAT also strained an already overheated state education system.
In India, as in Greece, the demand for private schooling is not just reflective of elite preferences but also a show of trust in affordable private schools, thereby making the demand cut across income spectrums.
For instance, about 31 per cent of children in India in 2015-2016 were enrolled in private schools, while about 11.5 per cent were enrolled in private institutions partly aided by the government, according to data from the Unified District Information System for Education.
Even in some poorer states such as Uttar Pradesh (51.37 per cent) and Rajasthan (49.23), half of all children enrolled were in private educatiol institutions.
Further, private school enrolment is not only an urban phenomenon. In rural areas of Madhya Pradesh 24.7 per cent of students aged 6-14 years were enrolled in private schools, as were 52.1 per cent in Uttar Pradesh, according to data from the 2016 Annual Status of Education Report.
Private schooling, in several parents’ minds, has come to be associated with quality, with some low-income families enrolling their children in private schools, which suggests that a tax on education could be regressive in ture.
Though parents believe private schools offer higher quality education, government schools in some states have also improved over the last two years.
Further, a 2014 study suggested that children who study in private schools were more likely to have educated parents (which could result in better learning outcomes), have fewer siblings and thus receive more parental attention, and be part of families richer than those who study in government schools.
If the government chooses to tax private education at the lowest slab rate (about 5 per cent), while also considering the tax already paid on inputs such as furniture and services (like rent), the effective tax rate would be even lower.
Careful framing of the law, i.e. the rate of tax and allowance of input tax credit with respect to education, could mitigate the impact of taxing education, and result in an increase in cost of education to the consumer by just about 2-3 per cent. (IANS)
(In arrangement with IndiaSpend.org, a data-driven, non-profit, public interest jourlism platform. Rishika Pardikar is a chartered accountant based in Bengaluru. The views expressed are those of IndiaSpend. Feedback at firstname.lastname@example.org)