Of late, certain inconvenient facts about both the BJP and the Congress are being bandied about by leaders of the rival political parties. It might be edifying to recall some of the allegations levelled and to examine their implications. By way of example, one can cite Rahul Gandhi’s three questions to Prime Minister rendra Modi about the Rafale deal. They are: (1) Did the Prime Minister get the necessary clearance from the CCS before he negotiated and committed to the purchase of Rafale aircraft in France? (2) How much did the PM agree to pay for each aircraft? (3) Why did the PM bypass HAL and prefer to favour a private entity with no previous defence production experience? One recalls the very recent commitment made by the Defence Minister to answer all questions relating to the Rafale deal. She has now reneged on that commitment. And neither the Prime Minister nor any of his Cabinet colleagues has anything to say about the Refale deal. This is rather unfortute, considering that we are citizens of a democratic country. There is no reason to protest the Prime Minister’s disinclition to talk about any of the sensitive operatiol matters relating to the Rafale aircraft because such information does indeed relate to tiol security. But how can the cost of each aircraft (purchased with public money) be concealed from the public on the plea that even this information is an official secret? Even if the suppliers of the Rafale aircraft had insisted on having a clause in the agreement that the price of each aircraft should not be made public, India should have made it very clear that the public had a right to know the cost of acquiring the Rafale aircraft, and hence such a clause was repugnt to the Indian government. Perhaps the real reason for not making the cost of the Rafale deal public is that it was inorditely high. This, in turn, could be due to the fact that the Indian sigtory to the agreement could have been the principal beneficiary of the deal. As a consequence, the cost of each aircraft might have turned out to be exorbitant because it also included hefty kickbacks.