By Amit Kapoor
India has seen a strong standalone performance in its growth in the recent past as compared to the other BRICS economies. This is partly due to the exterl environment and partly to the push for the right set of policies post the rendra Modi government coming to power in May 2014.
The exterl environment includes the low commodity prices (due to falling Chinese demand), particularly of crude oil, of which India has been a major importer. On the interl policy front, several schemes and reforms have been initiated and results of some of them are beginning to show - most notably in the power and coal and roadways development sector.
Modi has tried to pursue on India's exterl front what many observers regard as 'economic diplomacy'. It includes, among other things, drawing investments for economic growth. In the process, what is required is improving trade ties and deepening economic relationship with other economies. Also required is wooing investors and the diaspora, which are a major source of Foreign Direct Investment (FDI) flows and remittance flows to the Indian economy. However, all of this will function in the long-term only when there is trust and a continual push for reforms (either legislative or through directives) by the government and implementation on the ground.
India has already made considerable progress in attracting investors and emphasizing strong people-to-people contact with several countries. However, to keep the interest alive, it must focus on long-term implementation challenges and improvements in its capability to deliver.
A recent Peterson Institute for Intertiol Economics (PIIE) briefing report by C. Fred Bergsten rightly points to India's improved chances for trade-led growth, particularly by focusing on benefiting from the emerging intertiol architecture on trade led growth and economic development. It is because several countries' experience in the past especially Japan, South Korea, Singapore (from 1960's onwards) and most recently Chi post 1980s indicates that economic growth is possible by being in the global value chains of goods and services.
India's experience in this regard has been mixed. It has done well in some sectors like IT, automobiles and pharmaceuticals, among others. India must try to be part of bilateral and multilateral trading initiatives. This is because it will help India in access to markets and reduce the diversiory trade impacts that may be seen in case India is out of the global trading architecture and global value chains. Modi's visits to Malaysia and Singapore must be seen against this backdrop of the need for India to engage more openly with the world but at the same time keeping its strategic and tiol interests in mind.
From India's point of view, another reason to 'Act East' now is that these economies share close cultural and historical links with us, apart from having a long experience of trade-led development and economic growth. These countries can and are willing to help India in leveraging their expertise on smart urbanization and economic development. These are steps in the right direction for India to take learning and experience of societies that have been successful in addressing crucial problems of their times and fostering peace and prosperity.
Also, India needs to play a proactive role within the South Asian region. At present, the intraregiol trade is close to 5 percent within the South Asian economies while for the Association for South East Asian tions (ASEAN), it is close to 25 percent. Here, what has been observed is that domestic politics and historical fault lines have somehow continued to the present despite the experience one observes in other parts of the world. India's push in the ASEAN and APEC must certainly increase, but what must also increase is the benefits that trade brings within the South Asian region.
Overall, India seems to be heading in the right direction and with leadership at the topmost levels realizing the need for greater cooperation and action-oriented steps for its implementation. By cooperation and sharing of experience and resources at the intertiol level, India along with the other countries in Southeast Asia, Central Asia, Russia, Chi and Japan can certainly hope to make the coming century as a truly Asian one. IANS
(The article is co-authored with Sankalp Sharma, Senior Researcher at the Institute for Competitiveness, India. Amit Kapoor is Chair, Institute for Competitiveness & Editor of Thinkers. The views expressed are persol. Amit can be reached at firstname.lastname@example.org and tweets @kautiliya)