Though we are fortute to have a democracy in our country, its varied aberrations still make us a tion that keeps seeking the centrality of a functioning democracy regime. There are many experts in the field who have their independent opinions on the subject of democracy and who feel that our democratic system would have evolved in a better fashion if there been the right political-bureaucratic will to make the system a truly functioning one. And, then, there are questions like: After all, are we not a democracy still at work and why should expectations be so high when we are still a system at work? But then does it also not trigger the question as to whether a democratic system at work must also be seen to be working for those for whom the system is really meant – the people at large, and not just the affluent in the thriving community of politicians, bureaucrats and businessmen. Such reality vis-à-vis a system that calls itself democratic brings us to some larger issues. The most important one perhaps is: Whose democracy do we talk about? The great American statesman Abraham Lincoln says famously that democracy ought to be a system of governce and administration dedicated solely to the people because it is a system by the people and for the people. Otherwise, democracy is a mere fiction; its ideas are merely chimerical. What we see in India is that most of our political representatives are so intoxicated by pelf and power that they have no qualms at all in subjecting their people to a cruel game of deceit as long as they confidently continue to bask in the glory of power, and when they remember that an entity like the electorate even exists on earth is when elections knock at their doors and when they must win elections by hook or by crook, no matter what they have done to their constituencies and how.