Begin typing your search above and press return to search.

Why Dhaka sees Beijing, Delhi ties through different lenses

Sentinel Digital DeskBy : Sentinel Digital Desk

  |  27 Oct 2016 12:00 AM GMT

By Sreeradha Datta

Arriving at Dhaka’s Hazrat Shahjalal Intertiol Airport is always a happy moment for me. It was no different earlier this month when I went as a participant at the South Asia Economic Cooperation conference.

A surprising traffic-free ride to the hotel was interspersed with an unlikely silent procession ahead of me. A group of around 50 people, seemingly Chinese and carrying a Chinese flag, marched along the main road to the city which I then realised was to mark the visit of Chinese President Xi Jinping to Bangladesh, an event that was happening at that level after a gap of 30 years. Although the President’s stopover at Dhaka, en route to the BRICS Summit in Goa, was not for more than 24 hours the city seemed to have left no stone unturned to impress the visiting head of state.

The Chinese delegation’s presence at the same hotel where I and other conference participants were staying was something of an eye-opener as it transformed a friendly hotel lobby area to a near combat zone. Huge larger than life cutouts of both the leaders, Bangladesh Prime Minister Sheikh Hasi and Xi, were splashed across nearly all the main roads of Dhaka, not to mention the bright Chinese decorative bulbs that were strung along on both sides brightening up the usually dark roads.

What was particularly distressing for other hotel guests was the attempt to close off public spaces, including access to the hotel, and even returning to the hotel at night proved an ordeal in the face of Chinese paranoia about their security that had got them to ask the hotel to move other guests out during their stay.

The visit resulted in the signing of 27 agreements and MoUs between the two governments involving an amount of over $20 billion. There was also some reporting about Chi waiving off $24 billion worth of loans for Bangladesh, which is neither unprecedented nor unusual, given the rapidly deepening bilateral links.

Indeed, one has to follow the Sino-Bangladeshi bilateral trajectory to understand how pragmatism triumphs over ideology. Chi, once reluctant to even recognise Bangladesh, now shares a strategic partnership, with bilateral trade of over $10 billion with more than $9 billion in Beijing’s favour. However, this rather substantial trade gap has never been a bone of contention with Bangladesh and is in sharp contrast to the constant refrains from Bangladesh till sometime back to the trade deficit of around $6 billion a year ago vis-à-vis India.

Chi has for long been involved in various infrastructural projects in Bangladesh and 13 of the bilateral agreements covered infrastructure, construction, energy and transportation.

A Sino-Bangladeshi joint venture, the 1,224 MW thermal power plant at Banshkali, was formally iugurated during the XI visit. While noises about the Indo-Bangladeshi bilateral energy project at Rampal is becoming a subject of growing negative speculation not much protest has been heard over the Banskhali coastal project which has already resulted in the death of four locals protesting about the possible adverse effects over their local water and ecological systems — thus impacting the livelihood patterns of the inhabitants in the area.

It is not difficult to see why Bangladesh views India and Chi through distinctly different lenses. In the absence of any historic baggage and resultant absence of a hostile domestic constituency, Bangladesh is able to pursue an irritant-free policy towards Chi. Its leaders or political parties are not unduly worried about getting uncomfortably close to Beijing. The Chinese refusal to interfere in the domestic debates within Bangladesh and their non-preference for any particular party or ideology has also worked well for Beijing. Its influence and growing leverage over Dhaka is obvious and, presently, the bilateral convergence of interest is wide and encompassing various levels.

On the other hand, the Bangladeshi engagement with India is marred by history and geography-related problems and is a victim of confrontatiol domestic politics. Although Indo-Bangladeshi ties have seen a breakthrough in recent times, the perceived Indian high-handedness bogey comes to the fore again and again.

Bangladesh views Chi as a reliable partner and India as a close neighbour that offers promise but on which it is uble to repose its total trust upon. As Xi’s fleeting but bountiful visit revealed, the Sino-Bangladeshi relation receives blanket approval at all levels but the Indo-Bangladeshi engagement lacks similar widespread popular support within Bangladesh. Forty years down the line, it is not enough to attribute this gap to our geographic and historic causes alone; indeed there are deeper political fissures that need to be addressed. (IANS)

(Sreeradha Datta is Director, Maula Abul Kalam Azad Institute of Asian Studies (MAKAIAS), Kolkata. The views expressed are persol. The article is by special arrangement with South Asia Monitor/

Next Story