A year of crucial importance

DC Pathak

(The writer is a former Director Intelligence Bureau)

India is presently in the midst of efforts by the Narendra Modi government to reach a new high in building international relations, maintain domestic peace in the face of a planned attempt by hostile forces within and abroad to push the country towards a serious communal divide, and once again, in the run-up to the next general election, establish the image and strength of India as the world's largest democracy.

India’s Presidency of the G20, the challenge posed by the rise of minority politics at home, and the concerted campaign of opposition parties, including the regional entities, against the ruling dispensation all cumulatively add to the need for effective and firm governance in the country in the pre-election year.

Prime Minister Modi’s foreign policy initiatives have enhanced India’s image abroad and have also delivered on trade and economic relations, but the regime seems to be facing an increasing challenge in the area of internal security and stability because of divisive and disruptive politics at home and the organised attempts of anti-India forces within and outside of the country to build a narrative that India was moving towards an authoritarian, majoritarian, and non-secular rule.

Since the Modi government’s development agenda is in full swing and its schemes for the less privileged have also made an impact, the opposition has taken to finding fault with the democratic content of the present dispensation at the Centre and alleging misuse of coercive instruments of the state by the regime to selectively run down the leaders of other parties.

India, however, is used to the ‘wisdom of the crowd’ asserting itself in all critical situations, and there is little doubt that in a national poll, people would make a sound judgement on the integrity of the Modi government, its political will in safeguarding national security, and the sincerity of its efforts to develop the country economically.

India has made its G20 Presidency an event with a difference, with its motto ‘Vasudhaiva Kutumbakam, or ‘World is one family, setting the tone for a global mission that India wishes to pursue on this forum.

On the initiative of Prime Minister Modi, various international conferences in the run-up to the G20 Summit in September are being held at different locations across India to give the visitors a feel of the vastness, cultural richness, and development of this country and to spread awareness among the people here of the big strides India is taking to make its presence felt internationally.

Three distinct features of the G20 attract attention: the rise of India as a major power in the world with considerable influence on issues of global peace and development; the continuity of the policy of bilateral relations extended to a multilateral format that guaranteed mutually beneficial outcomes for both security and economic advancement; and the designing of G20 events in a manner that would promote domestic growth.

India is already the leading power in South Asia, and the G20 Presidency has provided it with an opportunity to gain the leadership of the South by propounding the cause of the less developed countries across the entire range of issues, from economic support to an equal say in environmental protection.

Nine of the twenty G20 members and as many as seven of the nine invitees represent the South, and India has done well to have deliberations on the specific matters of concern affecting them.

The G20 meetings being held in Arunachal Pradesh and Kashmir convey, among other things, India's assertive answer to China and Pakistan, who have been raising a dispute about these territories.

The domestic scene in India has for some time been subjected to communal divide, regional centrifugalism, and political allegations about the style of functioning of the Modi government.

The phenomenon of the Hindu-Muslim divide creating communal violence in India was the inevitable legacy of Partition, but the severity of the riots did taper off with time. However, the schism between the two communities has been perpetuated because of the minority politics' that the Ulema and the elite guiding the Muslims, as well as many of the political parties, indulged in for their vested interests, considering that a useful aid in elections.

During the Modi regime, forces in the opposition have constantly accused the former of promoting 'majoritarianism' for pushing the country towards Hindu rule and tried to build a narrative—in many cases in conjunction with anti-India lobbies abroad—that the minorities were feeling 'unprotected' under the present government.

The failure of an individual state government on the law-and-order front in any case of targeted public violence against individuals was unfairly blamed totally on the Centre, in disregard of the fact that the state was autonomous in handling crime and order in the constitutional scheme of things.

The threat to the internal security and stability of India is aggravated by the propaganda offensive of Pakistan alleging that the Muslim minority here was unsafe under Modi rule and the attempt of that country to raise this question at the Organisation of Islamic Conference (OIC) on the plea that Muslims of India were part of 'Ummah, to which the entire Muslim world, particularly Pakistan, stood committed.

Pakistan, supported by China, has voiced its opposition to the abrogation of Art. 370 by the Indian Parliament at the United Nations and implicitly projected Kashmir as a 'Muslim issue'. India has taken appropriate measures on diplomatic, political, and domestic fronts to counter the narrative floated by its adversaries.

In recent years, the communal divide has been exploited by anti-India forces within and outside of the country to foster faith-based militancy to foment terrorism in India and enlarge the ambit of cross-border terrorism in Kashmir as well by injecting a religion-linked motivation.

The trend that began with the formation of the Indian Mujahideen (IM) as an offspring of the Students Islamic Movement of India (SIMI), which had been established earlier by the Jamaat-e-Islami Hind at Aligarh in 1978, culminated in the early Nineties with the call for Jehad in Kashmir, replacing the earlier slogans of Plebiscite and Azaadi as Pak ISI planned to replicate the success of Afghan Jehad in the valley.

The pro-Pak lobbies in India and abroad have continued to abstain from naming Pakistan for cross-border terrorism in Kashmir and have in fact joined hands in fomenting Muslim separatism by alleging that the Modi government was deviating from the democratic path, by voicing opposition to the current policy of 'no talks with Pakistan, and by even deprecating the advocacy of nationalism by the present regime.

Ever since the Sino-Pak axis became aggressive against India, external threats to India's internal security multiplied; the two hostile neighbours were using their potential to fish in the troubled waters of India.

In the run-up to the general election next year, the country is exposed to an ever-increasing Hindu-Muslim divide, primarily because of the politically motivated campaign of the anti-BJP forces to the effect that the Modi government is pursuing the RSS agenda of establishing Hindu Rashtra in India and working against the Muslim minority.

The opposition parties evidently believed that, against a highly divided Hindu community, the consolidation of Muslim votes behind them would greatly improve their electoral prospects.

The Muslim minority is largely guided in politics by its leaders, but the community is not monolithic in terms of its political stand. It is good to reach out to various segments and sects to gain their trust; this is precisely what the ruling dispensation is attempting to do.

The anti-BJP parties, often in collaboration with civil society groups opposed to the Modi government, are projecting the present regime as illiberal, given to nepotism and violations of constitutional norms.

The Indian electorate, however, is a shrewd judge of whether or not Prime Minister Modi is taking the country on the path of economic development, unfailing national security, and special attention to the poor and the underprivileged. It can set its sights above the political tussles that are going on between the ruling party and its detractors.

The pre-election year is crucial both for testing the rise of India as a global power and evaluating the Modi government’s success in governance at home.

The presidency of the G20 and the dynamic framework in which its international conferences had been planned would certainly equip India with unprecedented potential as a world power, make it the fastest-growing economy, a tourist destination of repute, and an attractive market for investment, and would also reaffirm its democratic foundations.

Pakistan and China, the two hostile neighbours, would engage in putting down India's image as a self-supportive, secular, and peace-loving democracy. However, the reform-oriented, growth-driven, and welfare-minded rule of Prime Minister Modi is moving ahead along a nationalist path, undeterred by the distracting narratives built by anti-India forces within the country and outside.

The rise of the BJP government at the Centre has prompted some Tamil parties to revive their anti-North and anti-Hindi rhetoric for political reasons, even though they knew that their state was completely integrated with the Central administrative mainstream.

The Modi government needs to critically examine the quality of law-and-order management offered by the states, work for effective oversight on the IAS and IPS as the civil services that provide a uniform, apolitical, and people-oriented administration throughout the country, and do all it takes to ensure that national security is kept above politics in this country. It should adopt bold measures to train, monitor, and support the national civil services as India's prime instrument of governance and not hesitate to effectively intervene as per the mandate of the Constitution in the event of a state government failing to maintain administrative integrity in general and the law and order situation in particular.

The image of a country in the international community is significantly determined by the merits of its democratic governance and the political will of its leadership to respond to both security and economic challenges. (IANS)