All is not well in UN, decisions don’t address global priorities: Jaishankar

External Affairs Minister S. Jaishankar has said that ‘all is not well’ within the United Nations and that its decisions do not address global priorities.
Jaishankar
Published on

New Delhi: External Affairs Minister S. Jaishankar has said that ‘all is not well’ within the United Nations and that its decisions do not address global priorities. He pointed out how a UN Security Council member protected the terror group that claimed responsibility for the April 22 Pahalgam attack.

While launching a postage stamp to commemorate the 80th anniversary of the United Nations in New Delhi on Friday, EAM Jaishankar recalled the sacrifices of Indian UN peacekeepers and spoke about the recently hosted Chiefs of Army Staff conclave in the national capital, which witnessed participation from 30 troop-contributing countries.

He further said, “That said, we must also recognise that all is not well with the United Nations. Its decision-making neither reflects its membership nor addresses global priorities. Its debates have become increasingly polarised and its working visibly gridlocked.”

Pointing out how a United Nations Security Council member shielded a terror group which claimed responsibility for the Pahalgam attack, EAM Jaishankar said, “Any meaningful reform is obstructed using the reform process itself. Now, financial constraints have emerged as an additional concern. How to sustain the UN even while seeking its reinvention is clearly a major challenge before all of us. Few examples are more telling about the challenges facing the UN than its response to terrorism. When a sitting security council member openly protects the very organisation that claims responsibility for the barbaric terror attack, such as at Pahalgam, what does it do to the credibility of multilateralism?”

“Similarly, if victims and perpetrators of terrorism are equated in the name of global strategy, how much more cynical can the world get when self-proclaimed terrorists are shielded from the sanctioning process? What does it say about the sincerity of those involved? If the maintenance of international peace and security has become lip service, the predicament of development and socioeconomic progress is even more serious. The slowing down of the SDG Agenda 2030 is a significant metric to measure the distress of the global south,” the EAM said.

“There are many more, whether it is trade measures, supply chain dependence or political domination. Yet, on such a notable anniversary, we cannot abandon hope; however difficult, the commitment to multilateralism must remain strong. However flawed, the United Nations must be supported in this time of crisis. Our faith in international cooperation must be reiterated and indeed renewed. It is in that spirit that we all meet to mark this occasion and seek to build a better world,” he said. (IANS)

Also Read: Jaishankar, Canadian counterpart Anand agree on ‘new roadmap’ for India-Canada ties

Top News

No stories found.
The Sentinel - of this Land, for its People
www.sentinelassam.com