Navtej Johar verdict doesn't recognise same sex marriage, argues Centre

The Centre on Monday told the Delhi High Court that "marriage" is a term associated with heterosexual couples and "spouse" means husband and wife, as it contended that there is "some misconception" regarding the order in Navtej Singh Johar case which decriminalised homosexual sex but does not talk about marriage.
Navtej Johar verdict doesn't recognise same sex marriage, argues Centre

NEW DELHI: The Centre on Monday told the Delhi High Court that "marriage" is a term associated with heterosexual couples and "spouse" means husband and wife, as it contended that there is "some misconception" regarding the order in Navtej Singh Johar case which decriminalised homosexual sex but does not talk about marriage.

A division bench of Chief Justice D.N. Patel and Justice Jyoti Singh was hearing a batch of pleas seeking legal recognition of same sex marriage under the Foreign Marriage Act and the Special Marriage Act. The court said it will hear the final arguments on November 30.

Appearing for the Centre, Solicitor General Tushar Mehta said that Navtej Singh Johar's case does not talk about marriage, adding that marriage is permissible between a biological man and a biological woman.

Replying to a plea of a queer couple — an Overseas Citizen of India (OCI), and foreigner — seeking recognition of same sex marriages under the Foreign Marriage Act and Special Marriage Act, he said that it is a question of law and the issue here is whether marriage is permissible between homosexual couples. The petition, filed by advocate Karuna Nundy with lawyers Ruchira Goel, Utsav Mukherjee, Ragini Nagpal, and Abhay Chitravanshi, sought a declaration that a spouse of foreign origin of an Indian citizen or OCI cardholder is entitled to apply for registration as an OCI under Section 7A(1)(d) of the Citizenship Act, 1955, regardless of the gender, sex or sexual orientation of the applicant spouse.

Nandy also sought legal recognition of all same sex, queer, or non-heterosexual marriages under secular legislations for marriage such as the Foreign Marriage Act, 1969 and the Special Marriage Act 1954.

According to the petitioners, they are a married same-sex couple resident in Paris. They met in New York in 2001 and have been in a loving relationship for nearly 20 years. They got married in New York on August 6, 2012, and are recognised as a legally married couple in the US, France, and Canada - the three countries where they have primarily lived and worked in the last twenty years and now they are preparing for their new role as parents, and they are expecting their first child in July 2021. (IANS)

Also Watch:

Top Headlines

No stories found.
Sentinel Assam
www.sentinelassam.com