Top
Begin typing your search above and press return to search.

Supreme Court says large vacancies for Judges in lower Courts unacceptable

Supreme Court says large vacancies for Judges in lower Courts unacceptable

Sentinel Digital DeskBy : Sentinel Digital Desk

  |  23 Oct 2018 11:51 AM GMT

New Delhi: Describing as “unacceptable” the existence of 5,133 vacancies of judges in “Higher Judicial Service” and “Lower Judicial Service”, the Supreme Court on Monday sought the response of the State governments and the High Courts whether the time for the ongoing recruitment of 4,180 judicial officers could be shortened. Passing a suo moto order on the huge number of vacancies in the subordinate judiciary across the country, the bench of Chief Justice Ranjan Gogoi and Justice Sanjay Kishan Kaul sought the response from the High Courts/State governments as it noted that the recruitment process for filling 4,180 posts was already underway.

At a function on October 3 to felicitate Justice Gogoi upon his elevation as the Chief Justice of India, he had said that in the coming 3-4 months, he would focus on filling up about 5,000 vacancies in the subordinate judiciary in order to tackle a backlog of over 2.6 crore cases. He had, however, said that mere filling of vacancies would not solve the problem.

Seeking details as to when the recruitment process/processes for filling 4,180 posts for “Higher Judicial Service” and “Lower Judicial Service” was initiated and was expected to be complete, the top court wanted to know if the time being taken was beyond the seven-month schedule formulated by the top court in the Malik Mazhar Sultan case. Under the schedule, the process for recruitment has to commence on March 31 and be completed by October 31 of the calendar year.

The court said that the time limit fixed by it (top court) from the initiation of the recruitment process till its completion was the “outer limit” and not the “minimum period of completion.” Noting that there was a mismatch in the number of vacancies, the number of posts for which recruitment process is underway and those still pending, the apex court also sought details of the vacancies that have occurred since the current recruitment process commenced. The court also sought information whether “infrastructure and manpower available in the different states is adequate if all the posts that are borne in the cadre are to be filled up.” (IANS)

Next Story