Begin typing your search above and press return to search.

Supreme Court to Pronounce Ayodhya Verdict Today

Supreme Court to Pronounce Ayodhya Verdict Today

Sentinel Digital DeskBy : Sentinel Digital Desk

  |  9 Nov 2019 5:02 AM GMT

NEW DELHI: After seven decades of a protracted legal battle, the Supreme Court will pronounce the judgment in Ayodhya title dispute case at 10.30 a.m. on Saturday.

The notice on the Ayodhya judgment was uploaded on the website of the court during the late evening on Friday. Earlier, during the day, Chief Justice of India Ranjan Gogoi had held a highly confidential meeting with Uttar Pradesh Chief Secretary and the Director General of Police. It is learnt this meeting focused at taking stock of the law-and-order situation in the State.

A five-judge bench headed by Chief JusticeGogoi and comprising Chief Justice-designate Justice S.A. Bobde, Justice Ashok Bhushan, Justice D.Y. Chandrachud and Justice S.A. Nazeer, had reserved the judgment on October 17, after 40 days of daily hearing on the matter, which began on August 6.

On the last day of the hearing, the Hindu parties urged the court to take into consideration faith of the millions of people attached with the birthplace of Lord Ram, and the Muslim parties pleaded to restore the Babri Masjid, as it was, before the demolition in 1992. Both sides were involved in intense arguments in the last phase of the hearing, and it appeared high-pitched arguments had led to chaos in the courtroom.

The court began the daily hearing after the court-appointed mediation panel headed by former Supreme Court Justice F.M.I. Kalifulla and comprising spiritual guru Sri Sri Ravishankar along with senior advocate Sriram Panchu, failed to develop a consensus among the parties to arrive at an amicable solution.

On the last day hearing the Muslim parties urged the court to allow the matter to be settled between parties without passing a judgment. A faction in the Sunni Waqf Board, Uttar Pradesh, had apparently conceded title of the dispute to the Hindu side on terms and conditions. A representative of this faction told the media that the nature of dispute requires settlement and not judgment, which is essential to maintain peace in the country.

During the hearing, the judges had asked piercing questions, specifically focused at the complexity involved in faith and its legal outcome, to both parties. Senior advocate Rajiv Dhavan, representing the Muslim parties, had objected this line of questioning specifically targeting them but later, he apologized to the court on the same.

Dhavan also shot to the headlines, after shredding a pictorial map, submitted by one of the Hindu parties associated with the disputed site. Dhavan had objected to this submission. He was also the only lawyer who argued for two weeks, establishing the possession of Muslim parties on the disputed site, before the court. (IANS)

Also Read: Ayodhya: No tension, only apprehension ahead of Verdict

Also Watch: 83rd Raas Mahotsav Celebrations to begin in Nagaon’s Kampur from Nov 11

Next Story