International News

New York Times calls Pahalgam massacre a ‘terrorist attack’ after backlash

The New York Times shifts its tone, calling the Pahalgam massacre perpetrators “terrorists” for the first time, as India executes ‘Operation Sindoor’.

Sentinel Digital Desk

New Delhi: As India executed ‘Operation Sindoor’, a notable shift was observed in the editorial tone of prominent American daily The New York Times, which for the first time referred to the perpetrators of the Pahalgam massacre as “terrorists” in its headline — a marked departure from its earlier usage of softer terms such as “militants” and “gunmen”.

The front-page headline on the NYT website stated: “India Strikes Pakistan Two Weeks After Terrorist Attack in Kashmir,” signalling a distinct editorial change that has come amid growing criticism over the paper’s earlier coverage.

Despite the headline change, the NYT continued to use controversial terminology within the body of its report, referring to the region as “Indian-administered Kashmir” and “Indian-controlled side of Kashmir,” thus failing to acknowledge Jammu and Kashmir as an integral part of India.

This aspect of the report continues to draw flak from Indian observers and diaspora groups who argue that such language echoes Pakistan’s narrative on the region.

In its coverage of India’s retaliatory military action, the paper reported: “India said it had struck Pakistan after gathering evidence ‘pointing towards the clear involvement of Pakistan-based terrorists’ in last month’s attack on civilians.”

It also highlighted India’s emphasis that the response was “measured, responsible and designed to be non-escalatory in nature” and that “only known terror camps” were targeted during the overnight operation. The newspaper’s usage of the term “terrorist” in its headline gained widespread attention, particularly in view of the backlash it had received last month for its initial portrayal of the Pahalgam attackers.

At that time, critics slammed the NYT for describing the attackers merely as “militants” or “gunmen”, with many pointing out that such descriptions significantly downplayed the brutality of the incident.

The backlash was amplified by a post on social media platform X from the US House Foreign Affairs Committee, which shared a screenshot of the original NYT headline, “At Least 24 Tourists Gunned Down by Militants in Kashmir,” with the word “militants” crossed out and replaced with “terrorists” in bold red. (IANS)

Also Read: ‘Hope it ends quickly,’ Trump on India-Pakistan escalation

Also Watch: