NEW DELHI: The Supreme Court on Thursday allowed a petitioner, challenging the suspension of internet services in the violent hit State since May 3, to approach the Manipur High Court with his plea since the High Court is seized of a similar issue.
A bench of Chief Justice of India DY Chandrachud and Justices PS Narasimha and Manoj Misra asked the petitioner's counsel to approach the Manipur High Court as a similar matter is pending there. "The division bench is seized of the matter. Why don't you move the High Court? The moment we issue notice, the High Court will stop looking into the matter," CJI Chandrachud told advocate Shadan Farast, appearing for two Manipuri residents, advocate Chongtham Victor Singh and businessman Mayengbam James.
At the outset, Farasat said 14 orders have been issued and 65 days have passed since the internet was suspended in Manipur, and he asked the apex court to hear the case.
The bench, however, noted that the division bench of the High Court is hearing a similar matter and has also constituted a committee to find out whether the internet could be restored in the State. It was noted that the hearing before the High Court is scheduled for today.
"Yesterday we recommended the appointment of a regular Chief Justice of Manipur. Withdraw the petition from here and file it in the High Court," the CJI told the lawyer.
Accordingly, the apex court stated in its order, "A division bench of the High Court of Manipur is already seized of the matter in which an expert committee was formed and directed to examine whether the internet could be restored in the State. Advocate Shadan Farasat states that the principle of proportionality also merits consideration in the matter. Faced with the fact that an Article 226 petition is also pending, Shadan Farasat seeks permission to withdraw this matter, intervene in the pending matter, or file an independent petition before the High Court. Permission granted."
The plea was moved in the apex court, saying their lives and livelihoods have been severely affected by the statewide internet shutdown.
The plea said that the shutdown of the internet has had a significant economic, humanitarian, social, and psychological impact on both the petitioners and their families.
The petitioners have been unable to send their children to school, access funds from banks, receive payments from clients, distribute salaries, or communicate via email or WhatsApp, the plea said.
Chongtham Victor Singh told ANI that there has been a complete blockage of internet access across the State for almost a month, and it's causing significant harm to people's day-to-day lives and their fundamental rights.
The ban on the internet was imposed on May 3 and remains in effect.
"Continued suspension of the internet for the purpose of preventing rumour-mongering and the spread of misinformation does not pass the threshold prescribed by the Telecom Suspension Rules 2017," the petition stated.
There is no stipulated public order on the internet ban and it did not go through the oversight of the Review Committee, which is necessary under Law, he said.
The plea said that the order of the internet ban is strangulating the Freedom of Speech and Expression and the Freedom to carry on trade and occupation. The plea also stated that there is a violation of Rule 2(2) of the Telecom Suspension Rules, and hence they are unconstitutional.
The petitioners sought a restoration of the internet in Manipur, except for those areas in which there continues to be unrest and violence.
The top court took cognizance of the cases relating to the violence in Manipur and sought status reports from the Centre and State on the relief and rehabilitation efforts for the people affected by the violence between Meitei and Kuki communities. (ANI)
Also Watch: