SHILLONG: In a significant development, the Centre has constituted a two-member fact-finding committee to enquire into the grave issues that are plaguing NEHU.
This two-member fact-finding committee includes two great educationists: Prof. D.P. Singh, erstwhile Chairman of University Grants Commission (UGC) and Prof. Dilip Chandra Nath, former Vice-Chancellor of Assam University. The problem can be expected to get a much-needed clarity with these two educationists whose backing experience is nothing short of laudable.
As part of its mandate issued on November 15, the committee will investigate several contentious areas. These include controversies over appointments, a drop in university rankings, infrastructural neglect, and claims that the Vice-Chancellor was not responding to urgent demands. The government has asked the committee to furnish its findings within 15 days, which speaks to the urgency and seriousness of the situation.
Judicial oversight has also come into play, as the matter has reached the Meghalaya High Court. On November 22, the court, led by Chief Justice I.P. Mukerji and Judge B. Bhattacharjee, noted the importance of the committee’s findings before proceeding further. The division bench emphasized that it would be appropriate to wait for the probe report, its recommendations, and any corrective measures the university might implement.
The case has been fixed for its next hearing on December 6, such that judicial review and investigation progress are aligned. The allegations under probe are of multifaceted nature and have evoked widespread concern among the university fraternity, which includes students, faculty, and alumni. Issues of impropriety in appointments raise questions regarding meritocracy and fairness while the university ranking's decline marks broader problems in the maintenance of excellence in both academic and research visions.
Neglect of infrastructure and allegations of disengagement by the Vice-Chancellor have also eroded confidence in the administration, and the need is for swift and decisive action.
As the fact-finding committee continues to unearth facts, its findings will determine the future of the university. Recommendations, if the allegations are proved, will likely look like total overhauls of governance and overall operations within the institution. The report might, in the near future, be a blueprint to similar challenges at other universities.
The fact that the judiciary enters the equation leads to more importance on transparency and accountability in public institutions.
While waiting for the probe report, the court demonstrates its commitment towards ensuring that all decisions are informed and just. The outcome of such investigation will hence have ramifications that go beyond the university concerned to the larger higher education system in India. The committee report is now what everyone's eyes are on, as it may likely include all clarifications regarding actions to be taken in corrective measures.
ALSO READ:
ALSO WATCH: